Cursor vs Windsurf vs Antigravity vs Nimbalyst: Which AI Workspace Is Right for You in 2026?

A detailed comparison of Cursor, Windsurf, Google Antigravity, and Nimbalyst. Four different approaches to AI-assisted development. Compare features, architecture, pricing, and ideal use cases.

Karl Wirth ·

Cursor, Windsurf, Antigravity, and Nimbalyst represent four different bets on how developers will work with AI. Cursor and Windsurf are AI-enhanced IDEs that start with a code editor and add AI capabilities. Google Antigravity is a VS Code fork with a parallel agent “Manager View” built in. Nimbalyst is an AI-native workspace that starts with the AI agent and builds visual tools around it.

This is not a “which is best” article. Each tool excels for different workflows. This guide helps you pick the right one.


Architecture: Four Different Approaches

Cursor: AI-Enhanced VS Code

Cursor is a fork of VS Code with deeply integrated AI features. The code editor is the center of the experience. AI assists through inline completions, a chat sidebar, and an agent mode that can make multi-file edits.

  • Foundation: VS Code fork with the full extension ecosystem and familiar keybindings
  • AI model: Multiple models including Claude Sonnet, GPT, and Cursor’s own models
  • Agent mode: AI can read, edit, and create files, run terminal commands, and iterate on errors
  • Context: Codebase indexing, @-mentions for files/docs, .cursorrules for project context

The key advantage: it is a fully functional IDE. You can use Cursor as your only development tool.

Windsurf: AI-First IDE

Windsurf (by Codeium) takes a similar IDE approach but with a stronger emphasis on AI-native features like Cascade, a persistent multi-step AI workflow engine.

  • Foundation: Custom IDE (not a VS Code fork)
  • AI model: Codeium’s models plus third-party options
  • Cascade: Multi-step agent that maintains context across a chain of actions
  • Context: Automatic codebase understanding, no manual configuration needed

The key advantage: Cascade’s multi-step reasoning feels more autonomous than typical chat-based AI coding.

Antigravity: Google’s Agent IDE with Manager View

Google Antigravity is a VS Code fork with two modes: a traditional Editor View and a Manager View for orchestrating parallel agents.

  • Foundation: VS Code fork with full extension compatibility
  • AI model: Gemini 3.1 Pro/Flash by default, plus Claude and GPT support
  • Manager View: Control center for dispatching up to 5 parallel agents across workspaces
  • Built-in browser: Chrome integration lets agents launch, interact with, and screenshot your app

The key advantage: the Manager View gives you parallel agent execution inside a full IDE, with a built-in browser for visual verification.

Nimbalyst: Visual Workspace for AI Agents

Nimbalyst is not an IDE at all. It is a workspace application where Claude Code and Codex, the most powerful AI coding agents available, are the execution engines. You manage sessions, review changes, and do visual work (docs, diagrams, mockups) in a purpose-built interface.

  • Foundation: Cross-platform app (macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS) with Claude Code and Codex running underneath
  • AI agents: Claude Code (Claude Opus/Sonnet) and Codex (GPT-5.3), not custom models, the actual CLI agents
  • Multi-session: Run 6+ agent sessions simultaneously with kanban-style management
  • Visual tools: WYSIWYG markdown, Excalidraw diagrams, data model designer, mockup editor

The key advantage: you are using the most powerful coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) with a visual management layer on top, not a watered-down version embedded in an IDE.


Feature Comparison

Code Editing

FeatureCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Inline code editingYes (full IDE)Yes (full IDE)Yes (full IDE)Via agent (Claude Code/Codex handles edits)
AutocompleteYes (AI-powered)Yes (AI-powered)Yes (AI-powered)No (agents write complete implementations)
Syntax highlightingFull IDEFull IDEFull IDECode viewer with syntax highlighting
Extension ecosystemVS Code extensionsLimitedVS Code extensionsMCP extensions
Manual codingYesYesYesPossible but not primary workflow

Winner: Cursor/Windsurf/Antigravity for traditional code editing. These are IDEs where code editing is the core function. Nimbalyst delegates editing to the AI agent, which is intentional: the bet is that you should not be manually editing code that an agent can write.

AI Agent Capabilities

FeatureCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Underlying agentCursor’s agent modeCascadeGemini-powered agentsClaude Code + Codex (full CLI agents)
Multi-file editsYesYesYesYes
Terminal command executionYesYesYesYes
Agent qualityGoodGoodGood (Gemini 3.1)Best-in-class (Claude Opus/Codex)
Model flexibilityMultiple modelsLimitedGemini + Claude + GPTClaude + Codex models
Built-in browser testingNoNoYes (Chrome)No

Winner: Nimbalyst for agent quality. Claude Code and Codex consistently top coding benchmarks. Antigravity’s Chrome integration is a genuine differentiator for front-end work, but on raw coding capability, the Claude Code and Codex agents are a step above.

Multi-Session Management

FeatureCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Parallel agent sessionsCursor 2.0 (up to 8)NoYes (up to 5, Manager View)Yes (6+ sessions)
Session status boardNoNoInbox + workspace listKanban board
Git worktree isolationYes (Cursor 2.0)NoOne agent per workspaceAutomatic per session
Cross-session visibilityNoNoManager ViewUnified dashboard

Winner: Nimbalyst for session management. Antigravity’s Manager View is a solid step forward for an IDE, with inbox-style tracking and workspace-based isolation. But Nimbalyst’s kanban board with automatic status tracking, tagging, filtering, and mobile access is purpose-built for this workflow.

Visual Tools

FeatureCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Markdown editorPreview onlyPreview onlyPreview onlyWYSIWYG with AI
DiagrammingNoNoNoExcalidraw integration
Mockup creationNoNoNoMockupLM
Data model designNoNoNoDataModelLM
Browser previewNoNoYes (built-in Chrome)No

Winner: Nimbalyst for visual planning tools. Antigravity’s built-in browser is useful for front-end verification, but it is not a planning tool. Nimbalyst treats documents, diagrams, and mockups as first-class citizens alongside code.

Mobile Access

FeatureCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Mobile appNoNoNoiOS app
Remote session monitoringNoNoNoYes
Mobile diff reviewNoNoNoYes
Mobile agent controlNoNoNoYes

Winner: Nimbalyst. None of the IDEs offer mobile access. Nimbalyst’s iOS app lets you monitor sessions, review diffs, and respond to agent questions from your phone.

Pricing

PlanCursorWindsurfAntigravityNimbalyst
Free tierLimitedLimitedPublic preview (limited)Full app (free)
Pro$20/month$15/month~$20/monthFree (bring your own API keys)
Team$40/month/seat$35/month/seat~$40-60/seatFree

Winner: Nimbalyst on price. The app is free. You pay only for the underlying AI usage (your Anthropic/OpenAI API keys or Max subscription). The three IDEs all charge monthly subscriptions on top of AI costs. Antigravity’s pricing has been a source of controversy, with unclear credit systems and reduced free-tier limits.


Who Should Use What

Choose Cursor if:

  • You want a complete IDE replacement with one app for everything, including manual code editing
  • You are already in the VS Code ecosystem and want your extensions and keybindings
  • Your workflow is primarily single-session: one feature at a time, hands-on-keyboard coding with AI assist
  • You want inline autocomplete as your primary AI interaction

Choose Windsurf if:

  • You want an AI-first IDE with less VS Code baggage
  • Cascade’s multi-step reasoning fits your workflow better than chat-based interaction
  • You prefer a simpler interface with fewer configuration options
  • You are cost-sensitive and want a slightly cheaper IDE option

Choose Antigravity if:

  • You want parallel agents inside a full IDE with Google’s ecosystem
  • Built-in Chrome browser testing matters for your front-end workflow
  • You want Gemini models as your default with the option to use Claude or GPT
  • You like the idea of a Manager View for orchestrating agents without leaving your editor

Choose Nimbalyst if:

  • You use Claude Code or Codex as your primary coding tool and want a visual layer on top
  • You regularly run multiple agent sessions in parallel and need to manage them
  • Your workflow includes visual work (planning docs, architecture diagrams, UI mockups) alongside coding
  • You want mobile access to monitor and control agents from your phone
  • You want the best AI models (Claude Opus, Codex) without the quality trade-offs of IDE-embedded models

The Deeper Question

The real question is not “which tool has more features?” It is “where does the human add value?”

Cursor and Windsurf answer: the human adds value by writing and editing code, with AI as an assistant. The developer is still the primary author.

Antigravity sits in the middle: it is still an IDE, but the Manager View acknowledges that orchestrating multiple agents is a distinct workflow worth its own interface.

Nimbalyst answers: the human adds value by deciding what to build, planning the approach, reviewing the output, and managing multiple streams of work. The AI agent is the primary author. The human is the manager.

As AI agents get more capable (and they are getting more capable fast), the management-oriented approach becomes more compelling. Running five Claude Code sessions in parallel, steering them toward the right outcomes, and reviewing their work is a fundamentally different and more leveraged way to develop software.

If you are ready to try that workflow, download Nimbalyst free.